104 lines
4.3 KiB
Markdown
104 lines
4.3 KiB
Markdown
# Project Instructions — hikikomori / 분신 (가칭)
|
|
|
|
This repository is currently a **planning-docs repo** for an AI-twin messenger
|
|
("나를 대신해 남과 대화하는 AI 분신"). There is no application code yet.
|
|
|
|
Canonical docs live under `docs/`. Prefer linking to them over copying content
|
|
into prompts or new files.
|
|
|
|
## Document authority
|
|
|
|
When documents disagree, follow this order:
|
|
|
|
1. [`docs/decision-log.md`](docs/decision-log.md) — working assumptions for Q1~Q7
|
|
2. [`docs/vision.md`](docs/vision.md) / [`docs/PRD.md`](docs/PRD.md) / [`docs/tech-design.md`](docs/tech-design.md)
|
|
3. [`docs/roadmap.md`](docs/roadmap.md) / [`docs/risk-log.md`](docs/risk-log.md)
|
|
4. [`docs/PLANNING.md`](docs/PLANNING.md) — process guide
|
|
5. [`docs/idea-meeting-2026-06-29.html`](docs/idea-meeting-2026-06-29.html) — historical meeting source only
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
|
|
- Q1~Q7 in `decision-log.md` are **제안 (tentative)**, not final meeting
|
|
decisions. Do not silently reverse them. If a change is required, update
|
|
`decision-log.md` and all derived docs in the same change.
|
|
- `PLANNING.md` §2 may still show empty checkboxes (`☐`). That is stale
|
|
template state — prefer `decision-log.md` for current working answers.
|
|
- Stale wording such as “OS 레이어 → 자체 앱” is wrong. The working order is
|
|
**자체 앱 클로즈드 베타 first → OS 레이어 later** (`decision-log.md` Q7).
|
|
|
|
## Product identity (v1 working assumptions)
|
|
|
|
- Name (working): **분신**
|
|
- One-liner: ChatGPT talks *with* me; 분신 talks *as* me *to others*
|
|
- Target: consumer individuals first (not B2B)
|
|
- Delivery: self-owned messenger, closed beta
|
|
- Autonomy for v1: **L0~L2 only**
|
|
- MVP scenarios: **읽씹 종결** + **단톡 따라잡기**
|
|
- Platform: Android first
|
|
|
|
## Hard scope guards (do not expand without an explicit decision-log update)
|
|
|
|
Out of v1 scope:
|
|
|
|
- L3 full away-mode auto-reply
|
|
- L4 twin-to-twin negotiation / appointment auto-finalization
|
|
- OS-layer bridging over KakaoTalk / Instagram / etc.
|
|
- B2B / workspace products
|
|
- Server-side full conversation analytics that violate on-device-first
|
|
|
|
Do not design or implement Phase 2+ work before Phase 1 gates are validated
|
|
(`docs/roadmap.md`).
|
|
|
|
## Absolute safety invariants
|
|
|
|
These apply at every autonomy level and must not be weakened for convenience:
|
|
|
|
- Money, appointment confirmation, and emotional/sensitive topics always
|
|
escalate to the human. When uncertain, escalate (fail-safe).
|
|
- Twin-authored messages must be visually distinct (badge / `sender_mode`).
|
|
- Honest identity answers: if asked “본인이야 분신이야?”, answer as twin.
|
|
- Peer veto: if the other person rejects the twin, disable auto-reply for that
|
|
conversation immediately.
|
|
- Every automatic action needs post-hoc notification + one-tap undo.
|
|
|
|
## Privacy & architecture principles
|
|
|
|
- Tone/style learning: **on-device first**. Do not default to uploading raw chat
|
|
history to servers.
|
|
- Autonomy / escalation engine: **client-side** so safety is not blocked by
|
|
server latency or outage.
|
|
- Draft generation: on-device first, server LLM fallback with minimal context.
|
|
- Relay/storage server is allowed; it is not a license for full cloud analysis.
|
|
|
|
## Process rules
|
|
|
|
Follow `docs/PLANNING.md`: decide → narrow → validate → specify.
|
|
|
|
Current next priorities (do not invent a full stack first):
|
|
|
|
1. PoC #1 — on-device tone realism
|
|
2. PoC #3 — impersonation / trust acceptance (badge, veto UX)
|
|
3. Clickable prototype (badge + veto)
|
|
4. Small user interviews
|
|
5. Meeting review to promote Q1~Q7 from 제안 → 확정
|
|
|
|
Do not invent frameworks, folder layouts, or CI conventions until real code
|
|
exists. When code work starts, prefer Android-first changes aligned with
|
|
`docs/tech-design.md` and keep L0~L2 + safety invariants intact.
|
|
|
|
## Documentation conventions
|
|
|
|
- Planning docs are written in **Korean**.
|
|
- Keep decisions traceable with links to `decision-log.md` Q# and related files.
|
|
- Preserve `idea-meeting-2026-06-29.html` as historical source material; do not
|
|
treat it as the live decision record.
|
|
- When status changes, keep `PLANNING.md` §8, `roadmap.md`, and `risk-log.md`
|
|
in sync.
|
|
- Prefer updating existing docs over creating parallel overlapping docs.
|
|
|
|
## Communication with agents
|
|
|
|
- Read the relevant docs before proposing product/tech changes.
|
|
- Call out whether a suggestion is inside v1 scope or a future-phase idea.
|
|
- If requirements are ambiguous, ask before expanding scope.
|